Add every qualified lead to a Clay table
Push each qualified Embers lead into a Clay table as a new row, keyed on the LinkedIn URN, then enrich and route it inside Clay.
Clay is where a lot of teams do the second half of the work: take a person who just showed intent, enrich them, and decide what happens next. Embers can drop each qualified lead into a Clay table as a row, with the score, the ICP verdict, and the engagement that triggered it already attached.
Before you start
- A Clay workspace with room for the rows you are about to add.
- A table to receive the leads. A dedicated table is easier to reason about than a shared one.
- An idea of which enrichments should run on arrival, because they consume Clay credits per row.
Push leads into Clay
-
Create the table and its webhook source
In Clay, create the table and add an HTTP API source to it, so the table has its own receiving URL. Copy that URL.
-
Register the URL in Embers
In the Embers app, open Developer, then Webhooks (
/developer/webhooks) and add the Clay URL as an endpoint. It must be public HTTPS on port 443, with no#fragment in it. -
Subscribe to lead.created
Subscribe to
lead.createdonly. It fires once per newly qualified lead, which maps cleanly to one row per person.Leave
lead.engagement.addedoff unless you want a second row every time an existing lead engages again. New endpoints are not subscribed to it by default for exactly that reason. -
Send a sample and map the columns
With the source listening, use the sample send on the Webhooks screen. It arrives as
webhook.testwith the nested lead shaped like a reallead.created, so Clay can build columns from it without a test polluting anything downstream.Keep the columns that earn their place:
Column source What you get data.lead.linkedin_urnLinkedIn’s immutable member id. Use this as the row key data.lead.linkedin_urlThe profile link for humans, not for joining data.lead.name,title,companyWho they are today data.lead.score,icp_match,icp_confidenceThe qualification, on a 0 to 100 scale data.lead.icp_reasonOne sentence explaining the match data.lead.top_signalsThe signals behind the score data.lead.first_seen_at,follower_countAge of the record, and the divisor for engagement rate data.lead.work_history,certificationsUp to 10 entries each, without job descriptions data.engagement.recentComment text, post URL, author type, and timestamps data.lead.contactStored email and phone, when includedis true -
Enrich and deduplicate in Clay
Key the table on
linkedin_urn, not on the profile URL. Members change their vanity slug, and some are only ever seen in URN form, so the same person can arrive under two different URLs. Where the URN is blank on an older record, fall back todata.lead.id, the Embers UUID for that account and member pair.Then run your Clay enrichments on arrival, or on a filter such as score above 70.
What Embers sends and when
A lead reaches Clay when its score is above zero, it matched your ICP or you approved it manually, and its company is not blocklisted. Blocklisted companies never leave Embers.
Contact fields are a copy of what Embers already stores. The webhook never triggers a fresh lookup, so email and phone are null for anyone not yet enriched, and included is false. That is usually the right division of labour: let Embers hand over the person and the intent, and let Clay do the finding. See Lead enrichment and contact info.
Troubleshooting
Duplicate rows for one person. Delivery is at least once, and retries can arrive out of order. Deduplicate on webhook-id for exact repeats and on linkedin_urn for the person.
Rows arrive with empty enrichment fields. Check data.lead.contact.included before you branch on email. It is true only when a stored value exists.
Deliveries stopped. The endpoint pauses on a 4xx or after the retries are exhausted, roughly 6.3 days after the first attempt. The 30 day delivery log on the Webhooks screen shows which. See Webhook endpoint is paused.
Related
Was this article helpful?
What went wrong?
Thank you. We read every answer.
Still stuck?
Send us the article you were following and what happened. We answer from the same inbox that writes these pages.