# Embers vs Apollo

URL: https://useembers.com/vs/apollo/
Apollo facts checked on September 29, 2026, from its own pages

Apollo is a self-serve contact database and sales engagement platform (coverage plus sequencing). Embers ranks people already engaging on public LinkedIn into a Priority Queue for manual follow-up (timing).

## The short answer

Many teams keep both. Embers is not an Apollo clone and does not replace Apollo.

### Where Embers has the edge

- People are already engaging with you on public LinkedIn, and you want them ranked in a queue
- Every LinkedIn action stays manual: no password, cookies, extension, or bot
- Published self-serve pricing: Solo $49, Growth $99, Enterprise $199
- Coverage stays in Apollo; Embers adds who to contact first

### Where Apollo has the edge

- A self-serve contact database plus a sequencer in one workspace
- Coverage: finding people and companies you do not already have
- Email, phone, and task sequences for outbound at volume

## Feature scorecard

| Feature | Embers | Apollo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Contact database + sequencer | No | Yes: that is the Apollo job |
| Ranked public LinkedIn engager queue | Yes | No |
| LinkedIn password required | No | Not applicable; Apollo is a database and sequencer |
| Automated LinkedIn actions | No: you write and send | Not a LinkedIn bot product |
| ICP scoring of public engagers | Yes | Not the Apollo job |
| Published self-serve start | Solo $49/mo | Basic $49 per seat a month, billed annually |
| Watched public profiles | Solo 5 / Growth 10 / Enterprise 20 per workspace | Not a watchlist-of-public-LinkedIn-profiles product |
| Replaces the other tool | No: different job | No: different job |

## Published prices

### Embers

- Solo: $49/mo, or $39/mo billed annually
- Growth: $99/mo, or $79/mo billed annually
- Enterprise: $199/mo, or $159/mo billed annually
- Trial: your first 2,000 engagers free. No card to start.

### Apollo

- Basic: $49/mo (Per seat, billed annually; 30,000 credits per seat a year)
- Professional: $79/mo (Per seat, billed annually; 48,000 credits per seat a year)
- Organization: $119/mo (Per seat, billed annually, minimum 3 seats; 72,000 credits per seat a year)

As published at https://www.apollo.io/pricing on September 29, 2026.

## How the work differs day to day

Apollo is best for teams that need a self-serve contact database and sequencer / sales-engagement workspace.

|  | Embers | Apollo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Primary job | Rank people already engaging on public LinkedIn into a manual Priority Queue | Self-serve contact database plus sequencer / sales engagement (coverage) |
| Signal source | Public LinkedIn posts, comments you leave, keywords, and watched profiles | Contact and company records inside a self-serve database, plus sequencing |
| LinkedIn login | No password, cookies, or extension | Not a LinkedIn-login product; Apollo is a database and sales-engagement purchase |
| Automation | No LinkedIn bots. Drafts are manual. You send the message. | Sales-engagement sequences; not Embers' manual LinkedIn queue |
| ICP scoring of engagers | Yes: public LinkedIn engagers scored against your ICP | Not a person-level public LinkedIn engager queue |
| Starting price transparency | Solo $49 / Growth $99 / Enterprise $199 / Agency custom / Signal War Room $999 (annual $39 / $79 / $159) | Basic $49, Professional $79, Organization $119 per seat a month, billed annually |
| Setup model | ICP plus supported public sources, then review the Priority Queue | Self-serve contact database and sequencer setup |
| Best next step | Your first 2,000 engagers free | Confirm current terms with Apollo |

## Who should not pick Apollo

Teams whose next job is ranking people already engaging on public LinkedIn for manual follow-up. Embers does that job and does not replace Apollo.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Embers an Apollo alternative?

Only for a different job. People searching for an Apollo alternative usually want another contact database or sales-engagement workspace. Embers is a fourth option: it ranks people already engaging on public LinkedIn into a manual contact queue. Embers does not replace Apollo.

### Does Embers replace Apollo?

No. Never. Apollo is a self-serve contact database and sales engagement platform. Embers is a warm public LinkedIn signal workflow. They solve different jobs. Many teams keep both.

### Who should use both Embers and Apollo?

Teams that need coverage and timing. Keep Apollo when you still need a contact database and sequencer. Add Embers when you want a ranked Priority Queue of people already engaging on public LinkedIn.

### How much do Embers and Apollo cost?

Embers has Solo at $49/mo (annual $39), Growth $99/mo (annual $79), Enterprise $199/mo (annual $159), and Signal War Room $999/mo. Solo, Growth, and Enterprise include a free trial of the first 2,000 engagers that starts at signup with no card. Contact fields are available on paid plans when found. Apollo publishes per-seat plans billed annually: Basic $49, Professional $79, and Organization $119 (minimum three seats) a month, checked September 29, 2026.

### Does Embers need my LinkedIn password?

No. Embers does not require your LinkedIn password, cookies, browser extension, or a bot. You review drafts and send messages yourself.

### Does Embers connect to HubSpot or Zapier?

Slack, native HubSpot, native Salesforce, native Pipedrive, native Attio, native HeyReach, native Instantly, native Smartlead, native Emelia, and signed HTTPS webhooks (up to 10 endpoints) are all on Solo and above, and are configured by a workspace admin. Zapier, Make, and Clay consume those signed webhooks as recipes; they are not native Embers SDKs. Embers does not ship a native Apollo sync.

### Where else should I compare Apollo?

For alternative-search intent, read the Apollo alternative page. For adjacent data jobs, read Apollo vs ZoomInfo, Clay vs Apollo, and Apollo vs Lusha. For warm-signal peers, read Embers vs Traxy, Embers vs Trigify, and Embers vs Clay. None of those pages claim Embers replaces Apollo.

## Related

- [Apollo alternatives](https://useembers.com/apollo-alternative/)
- [Embers vs Apollo](https://useembers.com/vs/apollo/): Job-split comparison: coverage plus sequencing in a contact database versus timing from public LinkedIn engagement.
- [Apollo alternative](https://useembers.com/apollo-alternative/): The live listicle for alternative-search intent. Not a duplicate of the vs job-split.
- [Apollo vs ZoomInfo](https://useembers.com/compare/apollo-vs-zoominfo/): Compare the adjacent database jobs without treating Embers as an Apollo replacement.
- [Clay vs Apollo](https://useembers.com/compare/clay-vs-apollo/): Compare Clay's GTM workflows with Apollo's database and sequencer.
- [Apollo vs Lusha](https://useembers.com/compare/apollo-vs-lusha/): Compare Apollo with Lusha's credit-based contact reveals.
- [Embers vs ZoomInfo](https://useembers.com/vs/zoominfo/): Sibling job-split: enterprise sales-intelligence coverage versus a warm LinkedIn queue.
- [Every comparison](https://useembers.com/compare/)
- [Embers pricing](https://useembers.com/pricing/)