Run both Alternatives Checked September 29, 2026

RB2B alternatives, ranked by fit.

RB2B is best for teams with steady website traffic who want to know which people visited. If that is not you anymore, here is where teams go instead, and what each one is good at.

Start free trial See pricing

Your first 2,000 engagers free. No card to start.

Moving offRB2B 2 options
Sort by
  1. EmbersFounder-led teams, sales teams, and agencies whose buyers engage on LinkedIn $49/mo
  2. ClayGTM, growth, and revenue-operations teams that want to combine multiple data sources, research agents, signals, and automated GTM workflows $167/mo

Why people switch

Why teams look past RB2B.

  1. Their buyers engage on LinkedIn before they ever visit the site

  2. Want a reason to reach out, not only a visit

  3. Want competitor and keyword signals, not just their own traffic

Worth checking in RB2B first

  • Only works with site traffic
  • Identification is not available for every visitor

The shortlist

RB2B alternatives, and who each one suits.

Ranked by fit for teams whose buyers show up on LinkedIn. Prices are each vendor's published entry price.

  1. Embers

    A ranked queue of the people engaging with your LinkedIn market, with the reason each one surfaced.

    From$49/mo

    Best for Founder-led teams, sales teams, and agencies whose buyers engage on LinkedIn.

    Does well

    • No LinkedIn password, cookies, or extension
    • ICP scoring with a readable reason on every lead
    • Workspace pricing from $49 a month

    Skip Embers if you need

    • LinkedIn only
    • Never sends: you or your sending tool do

    Embers vs RB2B

  2. Clay

    GTM platform for data, AI research, signals, and workflow automation

    From$167/mo

    Best for GTM, growth, and revenue-operations teams that want to combine multiple data sources, research agents, signals, and automated GTM workflows.

    Does well

    • Broad data marketplace with 200+ providers
    • AI research, enrichment waterfalls, and flexible GTM workflows
    • Signals and intent tracking beyond a single social channel

    Check before you pick

    • A broad platform can require more workflow ownership than a focused daily lead queue
    • Action and data-credit usage should be mapped to the team’s expected volume

    Embers vs Clay Clay website

Scorecard

Embers against RB2B, feature by feature.

The full side by side lives on the Embers vs RB2B page. Here is the scorecard.

Feature Embers RB2B
LinkedIn login required Same No no password, cookies, or extension No
Website visitor signals By design No Yes
LinkedIn engagement signals By design Yes No
ICP scoring Yes Not the core product
Slack delivery Same Yes Yes
Starting price $49/mo $79/mo

Pricing

Published prices, on one scale.

Every Embers plan is one workspace: no seats, no credits, no LinkedIn-account pricing. Your first 2,000 engagers are free.

Embers

  • Solo $49/mo
  • Growth $99/mo
  • Enterprise $199/mo

RB2B

  • Starter $79/mo
  • Pro $149/mo
  • Pro+ $199/mo

RB2B prices as published on its pricing page, checked September 29, 2026. Prices in another currency are shown as published, not converted. Outlined bars are quoted or billed yearly. Check RB2B's current pricing.

Run both

Switch without a gap in four steps.

Keep RB2B running while Embers fills its first queue, then compare the two on the same week.

  1. Point Embers at the same sources

    Add the profiles you watch in RB2B (your team, competitors, creators) to the Watchlist, and your keywords to Keyword Tracker.

    How it works

  2. Describe your buyer once

    Give Embers your website or a sentence about your buyer. It builds the ICP that decides who becomes a lead and how they rank.

    How it works

  3. Start with history, not an empty queue

    The first scan reaches back through up to 365 days of public activity, so the queue is useful on day one.

    How it works

  4. Run both for a week, then decide

    Work both queues on the same week and keep the one whose leads you actually follow up. Nothing is deleted if you stop.

    How it works

Keep comparing

More side by sides, same lane.

Head to head RB2B vs Warmly Consider Embers for the interest that never reaches your website. Signal tools Embers vs Gojiberry AI AI-powered LinkedIn intent detection and outreach automation Signal tools Embers vs Traxy LinkedIn engagement qualification and lead routing Signal tools Embers vs EngageFast Warm LinkedIn leads and daily follow-ups inside a Chrome extension
Every comparison

How we compare

Embers wrote this page, and Embers is one of the products in it. Facts about other tools come from their own product and pricing pages on the date shown; Embers facts come from our pricing and help center. Where a vendor does not say, we say so instead of guessing. Spot something out of date? Write to viraj@useembers.com and we will fix it.

FAQ

Leaving RB2B?
Common questions.

Straight answers, with the plan or help article behind each one.

Open the help center

Yes. They watch different signals: RB2B your website, Embers public LinkedIn activity. Both can deliver to Slack.

No. Embers works from public LinkedIn activity: posts, comments, keywords, and profiles you watch.

Your next pass

See which public signals are
worth your time.

Start with your first 2,000 engagers free and review the fit before choosing a plan. No card to start.

Start free trial Or see pricing

Your first 2,000 engagers free · No card to start · No LinkedIn login · Cancel anytime

Start free trial